On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 11:08 -0400, Andrew Montalenti wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:02 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > ... > > Bogofilter, in my experience. It's not even close. After training, my > > spamassassin never got better than 90% catch rate, which is still some > > hundred spams a day for me. Bogofilter is 99.9% at least, probably > > better. False positive rate is better too. >
I was ready to switch to Bogofilter unitl I upgraded to 3.2. I would have to mark so many emails as spam in previous versions, but now I get damn near zero spam in my inbox. If anything it is a little 2 aggressive, but I'd rather have that than having it only catch half of the spam. > That's interesting... I'm wondering, is there a way to migrate your > SpamAssassin tokens database (the stuff stored in .spamassassin/*) to > bogofilter? And, does anyone know what accounts, specifically, for its > better accuracy over SA? > > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
