> > I beg to differ.
> >
> > Partha, according to your comment #35 on this bug, the patch was
> > committed to HEAD only. Thus, as far as the users are concerned, this
> > bug is NOT fixed.
> >
> > This is a crasher bug. And there is a fix. Why don't you commit this to
> > the stable branch as well?
>
> Agreed. I shall commit. This thing somehow got missed going to the
> stable branch, cos of some string changes and stuff.
Thanks for clarifying this, Partha. I wasn't aware of the string changes
involved.
Anyway, even though the patch is pretty short, I had a hard time
grokking this. The bug #315987 was filed against Evo 2.4.x, same for the
report in this thread. However, the patch deals with my pet peeve,
"disabled accounts" and stuff. Which went in into HEAD (Evo 2.5.x) only
and is not part of 2.4.x...
So I wonder: Does this really fix any Evo 2.4.x issue? Does this fix
this issue?
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
