*poke* Going to respond to this eventually?
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 16:12 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > I beg to differ.
> > >
> > > Partha, according to your comment #35 on this bug, the patch was
> > > committed to HEAD only. Thus, as far as the users are concerned, this
> > > bug is NOT fixed.
> > >
> > > This is a crasher bug. And there is a fix. Why don't you commit this to
> > > the stable branch as well?
> >
> > Agreed. I shall commit. This thing somehow got missed going to the
> > stable branch, cos of some string changes and stuff.
>
> Thanks for clarifying this, Partha. I wasn't aware of the string changes
> involved.
>
> Anyway, even though the patch is pretty short, I had a hard time
> grokking this. The bug #315987 was filed against Evo 2.4.x, same for the
> report in this thread. However, the patch deals with my pet peeve,
> "disabled accounts" and stuff. Which went in into HEAD (Evo 2.5.x) only
> and is not part of 2.4.x...
>
> So I wonder: Does this really fix any Evo 2.4.x issue? Does this fix
> this issue?
>
> ...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
