AG, temperature follows density. As density increases indefinitely, so does
temperature. Expansion rate doesn’t need to be infinite, compression alone
drives temperatures to extreme levels.

Quentin

Le dim. 2 mars 2025, 08:11, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit :

>
>
> On Saturday, March 1, 2025 at 4:02:15 PM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>
> On the 26th and in other replies I did say:
>
> As I've explained already, it's not that the volume goes to zero, but
> density that goes to infinity, everywhere, there is no valid notion of
> volume in an infinite universe.
>
> What is difficult to understand?
>
> Quentin
>
>
> I deleted that post. You must have replied to your email list.  But you
> misconstrued the question posed. As the density goes to infinity, the rate
> of expansion keeps increasing (but not to infinity), so how do the
> competing rates result in an ultra high temperature? I suppose it's because
> the first is unbounded and latter bounded. AG
>
>
>
> Le sam. 1 mars 2025, 06:42, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 28, 2025 at 1:22:43 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/27/2025 10:59 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, February 27, 2025 at 4:17:13 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/26/2025 11:39 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
>
> If we assume an infinite universe and run the clock backward, is it
> reasonable to conclude that the singularity we imagine forming in the
> observable region,
>
> The singularity is not IN the observable region, it is the limiting origin
> of the observable region.
>
> is identically the same singularity for the entire universe? Secondly, why
> do we imagine the hypothetical singularlty indicates the GR fails in this
> situation? After all, if the expanding universe is determined by
> measurements, and the average distances between galaxies decreases as the
> clock runs backward is also determined by measurements, what has this to do
> with GR, since it's all measurement determined? TY, AG
>
> You can't be so dense as to not know the difference between a measurement
> and an extrapolation.
>
> Brent
>
>
> I'm just saying that measurements suggest a singularity without applying
> GR. The reason the unobservable region is unobservable is because expansion
> in that region is faster than light speed. So if we run the clock backward,
> won't that region collapse faster than light speed, with the result that
> the entire universe converges to a single singularity? AG
>
> It depends I suppose on what "run the clock backwards" means.  It's
> unphysical to have spheres of outgoing radiation contract backward to a
> point as in playing a video backwards.  But if that's what you mean then
> yes the entire universe becomes infinitely dense, a singularity...but not a
> point, it's still infinite.
>
> Brent
>
>
> So, as we go backward in time, the observable universe seems to converge
> to a point, while the rate of expansion of the unobservable universe
> increases since the rate of expansion in earlier times was greater than it
> is at present? In this scenario, how could the unobservable univese reach
> an ultra high temperature as we approach the BB? AG
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
>
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/629ffae7-7336-4bc5-bb65-54e18e288147n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/629ffae7-7336-4bc5-bb65-54e18e288147n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/89941b02-58f3-49a2-8f97-49fa0e1f1e99n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/89941b02-58f3-49a2-8f97-49fa0e1f1e99n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAqBRmaYWa8%3D%2BC7W1XGs6LcfRfs0-i%3Dok0fsrM5oGYomZQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to