On Friday, January 31, 2025 at 11:09:29 AM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote:



Le ven. 31 janv. 2025, 18:05, Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> a écrit :



On Friday, January 31, 2025 at 10:36:33 AM UTC-7 John Clark wrote:

On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 9:39 AM Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:

*>>> the basis for claiming that everything that's possible to happen, must 
happen, is a question you've never answered*


*>> You've asked that question many times and I've answered it many times, 
and my answer is always the same;  the claim is derived from the one and 
only assumption that Many Worlds makes, Schrodinger's Equation means what 
it says.  So far nobody has ever performed an experiment that disproves 
that assumption, if anybody ever does then Many Worlds is dead wrong.*


*> That's a non-answer, just an excuse for an answer. S's equation is just 
that; an equation. What about the equation allows your equation to have the 
meaning you ascribe to it? AG *



*Schrodinger's equation uses complex numbers to deterministically derive a 
quantum wave. That quantum wave must be a real thing because, thanks to 
experiment, we know for a fact that the square of the absolute value of it 
corresponds with something real, that is to say something that has a 
possibility of being observed. For example, Schrodinger's equation says 
that a system consisting of a neutron decaying into a proton, an electron 
and an antineutrino has a wave function that is NOT zero and therefore can 
be observed, but a wave function that has an electron turning into a proton 
has a wave function that is zero and therefore can NOT be observed by 
anyone anywhere. *

*Please note that if Schrodinger's equation says that something can be 
observed, that does not necessarily mean that YOU can observe it, nor does 
it mean you know somebody who could observe it, and it doesn't even mean 
that it's possible for you to know somebody who could observe it. It only 
says that the event can in theory be observable by somebody.*


*This is not what S's equation says. For example, in a slit experiment, on 
a single trial it just tells us the probability of every possible outcome, 
not that every possible outcome MUST happen.*



So if it wasn't so, repeating the experiment shouldn't give interference 
patterns. 


At least for non-relativistic QM, S's equation presumably contains all 
information, including that for interference. So a single measurement 
doesn't negate those infinitely many possible outcomes, inclusive of 
interference. Clark's persistent and unshakeable error is to add a 
postulate to the equation which is nowhere in sight; namely, that every 
possible outcome MUST occur somewhere, which is where Many Worlds is 
postulated. AG 



* You've added that to what the equation says, but are not aware of having 
done so, or won't admit it. AG*



*By the way, if you ever want to end this conversation all you need to do 
is talk about cults or Trump physics. *

*John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis 
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*

 

*>Whichever turn you take, there exists an uncountable set of paths, 
corresponding to the set of possible curves*


*Maybe. Maybe not. There is no doubt that mathematically the set of all 
possible curves is uncountably infinite, but we're talking about physics 
not mathematics, so the answer is not clear at all. There might be an 
uncountably infinite number of paths, there might be a countably infinite 
number of paths, there might only be an astronomical number to an 
astronomical power FINITE  number of paths; it all depends on if time 
and/or space is continuous or discrete. Schrodinger's Equation is an 
agnostic on that question, and so is Many Worlds.*

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/122dbf1c-bff6-439c-8bf3-b71aeb41202cn%40googlegroups.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/122dbf1c-bff6-439c-8bf3-b71aeb41202cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6af898c4-8a38-42de-af45-609179652e6an%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to