On 1/12/2025 5:33 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Sunday, January 12, 2025 at 6:24:01 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote:

    On Sunday, January 12, 2025 at 6:00:33 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote:

        On Sunday, January 12, 2025 at 5:52:42 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker
        wrote:




            On 1/12/2025 8:38 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:


            On Saturday, January 11, 2025 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7 Brent
            Meeker wrote:




                On 1/10/2025 11:29 AM, John Clark wrote:
                On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 2:15 PM Alan Grayson
                <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:

                                />>>If I believe in SR, then I can
                                use length contraction to establish
                                the car won't fit in garage in car's
                                frame./


                        *>> That depends entirely on what you mean
                        by"the car won't fit inthe garage". In the
                        above I've told you exactly what I mean by
                        the term. What do you mean? *


                    /> What do I mean; what any sane person would
                    mean; that the car's length is fixed from the
                    pov of the car's frame when car is moving, but
                    the garage's length is shortened from an initial
                    condition where it starts out shorter. AG /


                *That's all very nice but that's not what I asked.
                What _exactly_ do you mean by "the car won't fit in
                the garage" if it's not "the front of the car is
                fully within the garage while _SIMULTANEOUSLY_ the
                back of the car is also fully within the garage"?*
                I think you meant "the car *will *fit in the garage."

                But there's been so much unproductive back and forth
                on this thread, which I thought I had put to bed,
                that I'm going to try again and to make everything
                even more graphic and explicit.  Here's the spacetime
                diagram in the reference frame of the garage (which
                we would ordinarily refer to a stationary):
                *

                *Here we see that the car, whose proper length is
                10', traveling at 0.8c is Lorentz contracted to a
                little over 6'.  We start with the entrance open and
                the exit closed and we see that we can close the
                entrance door before we have to open the exit door
                because there is a brief period in which the car is
                fully within the 8' garage, the red trapezoid.  If
                the distances are in feet then the times are in
                nano-seconds.  So the exit door can stay closed for
                about 2.5 nano-seconds after the entrance door
                closes, as measured in the garage reference frame.
                For those 2.5 nano-seconds the car is fully inside
                the garage.

                Now consider that same events in the car's frame of
                reference.  Keep in mind the technical meaning of
                "event" is a point in spacetime, not a "happening" as
                in casual parlance.  So points in the above diagram,
                like "FRONT ENTERS" are events and the Lorentz
                transformation preserves events but it in general
                changes their spacetime relation.  Here is the
                Lorentz transformation, point-by-point, of the above
                diagram.  The two diagrams are physically identical;
                differing only in being viewed from different states
                of motion:


                Specifically in this case the time order of "REAR
                ENTERS" and "FRONT EXITS" is reversed.  This is
                typical of space-like separated events: their order
                is different in different reference frames.  So from
                the car's point of view there is a period of about 7
                nano-seconds during which both doors are open and so
                the car sails thru without hitting a door.*

                *Brent


            When you write the time order of events is reversed,
            presumably in the car frame, does this mean the rear of
            the car enters the garage before the front enters (which
            is physically impossible)? If not, what do you mean? AG
            That's the sort of question that gets you a troll
            reputation.  The events are clearly labelled and the axes
            have time and position variables.  If you can't read the
            diagram you won't understand a written explanation any better.

            Brent


        As I was scrolling down to your reply, I was expecting a BS
        answer and that's what I got. F the troll BS. When I worked at
        JPL no one questioned my ability of reading plain English. But
        you know better. AG


    In the car frame, the Front Exits and Rear Enters, in this order,
    so the car doesn't fit. In the garage frame, the Front Enters and
    Rear Enters, in this order, so the car fits, but the latter isn't
    the opposite of the former, AFAICT. AG


BTW, your plots are the constructions of pure genius; you have in the car frame, the front enters and front exits at the same spatial coordinate, so it never moved between entering and leaving. Like I said, pure genius. AG
Would you like it better if the car moved *in the car frame*?

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/620fce53-4102-4670-8a0f-e7d221ea6368%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to