On 1/12/2025 5:24 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Sunday, January 12, 2025 at 6:00:33 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote:

    On Sunday, January 12, 2025 at 5:52:42 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:




        On 1/12/2025 8:38 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:


        On Saturday, January 11, 2025 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7 Brent
        Meeker wrote:




            On 1/10/2025 11:29 AM, John Clark wrote:
            On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 2:15 PM Alan Grayson
            <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:

                            />>>If I believe in SR, then I can use
                            length contraction to establish the car
                            won't fit in garage in car's frame./


                    *>> That depends entirely on what you mean
                    by"the car won't fit inthe garage". In the above
                    I've told you exactly what I mean by the term.
                    What do you mean? *


                /> What do I mean; what any sane person would mean;
                that the car's length is fixed from the pov of the
                car's frame when car is moving, but the garage's
                length is shortened from an initial condition where
                it starts out shorter. AG /


            *That's all very nice but that's not what I asked. What
            _exactly_ do you mean by "the car won't fit in the
            garage" if it's not "the front of the car is fully
            within the garage while _SIMULTANEOUSLY_ the back of the
            car is also fully within the garage"?*
            I think you meant "the car *will *fit in the garage."

            But there's been so much unproductive back and forth on
            this thread, which I thought I had put to bed, that I'm
            going to try again and to make everything even more
            graphic and explicit. Here's the spacetime diagram in the
            reference frame of the garage (which we would ordinarily
            refer to a stationary):
            *

            *Here we see that the car, whose proper length is 10',
            traveling at 0.8c is Lorentz contracted to a little over
            6'.  We start with the entrance open and the exit closed
            and we see that we can close the entrance door before we
            have to open the exit door because there is a brief
            period in which the car is fully within the 8' garage,
            the red trapezoid.  If the distances are in feet then the
            times are in nano-seconds.  So the exit door can stay
            closed for about 2.5 nano-seconds after the entrance door
            closes, as measured in the garage reference frame.  For
            those 2.5 nano-seconds the car is fully inside the garage.

            Now consider that same events in the car's frame of
            reference.  Keep in mind the technical meaning of "event"
            is a point in spacetime, not a "happening" as in casual
            parlance.  So points in the above diagram, like "FRONT
            ENTERS" are events and the Lorentz transformation
            preserves events but it in general changes their
            spacetime relation.  Here is the Lorentz transformation,
            point-by-point, of the above diagram.  The two diagrams
            are physically identical; differing only in being viewed
            from different states of motion:


            Specifically in this case the time order of "REAR ENTERS"
            and "FRONT EXITS" is reversed. This is typical of
            space-like separated events: their order is different in
            different reference frames.  So from the car's point of
            view there is a period of about 7 nano-seconds during
            which both doors are open and so the car sails thru
            without hitting a door.*

            *Brent


        When you write the time order of events is reversed,
        presumably in the car frame, does this mean the rear of the
        car enters the garage before the front enters (which is
        physically impossible)? If not, what do you mean? AG
        That's the sort of question that gets you a troll reputation. 
        The events are clearly labelled and the axes have time and
        position variables.  If you can't read the diagram you won't
        understand a written explanation any better.

        Brent


    As I was scrolling down to your reply, I was expecting a BS answer
    and that's what I got. F the troll BS. When I worked at JPL no one
    questioned my ability of reading plain English. But you know
    better. AG


In the car frame, the Front Exits and Rear Enters, in this order, so the car doesn't fit. In the garage frame, the Front Enters and Rear Enters, in this order, so the car fits, but the latter isn't the opposite of the former, AFAICT. AG
That's right.  You can read the diagram!

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3436a827-9dc2-42ce-af98-fb495ef04382n%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3436a827-9dc2-42ce-af98-fb495ef04382n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6b6a6b72-c0bf-4421-a2e1-557126094b7c%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to