On 1/5/2025 7:44 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
You claim there is no objective fact. The car fitted in the garage.
But that's only from the garage frame.
If it's from only one frame and not another, that's the definition of
"not objective". It's not fact. It's subjective perception.
Brent
It doesn't fit from the car frame, regardless of the doors, which IMO
can be dispensed with. So, as I see it, the paradox follows from the
belief that there can't be disagreement about what the frames
conclude. Isn't this the claim that must be disproven to resolve the
paradox, and a constructive proof that the frames disagree using the
LT is insufficient? AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8895ba87-ba57-4186-b690-cbd533f6ed82%40gmail.com.
