> On 11 Jun 2020, at 04:00, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 11:25:51 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
> 
> 
> On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 10:29:34 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
> 
> 
> On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 6:26:10 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
>> On 7 Jun 2020, at 17:56, Alan Grayson <[email protected] <>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sunday, June 7, 2020 at 9:00:46 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
>> It predicts everything, so it predicts nothing. AG
>> 
>> It's not unlike the monkey typing at random and coming up with Shakespeare's 
>> plays, or the Bible. AG 
> 
> Using this analogy, it is more like the monkey typing *all* books. Except 
> that the monkey is elementary arithmetic, and there is non need of randomness 
> at that stage, and also, the books are not books, but true (semantic) 
> relations implementing computations, and then physics is shown to be an 
> internal measure, isolated from the Göde-Löb-Solvay theorem in the 
> mathematics iff self-reference.
> 
> The theory is Kxy = x together with Sxyz = xz(yz), as I have explained a year 
> ago.
> 
> The theology is the modal logics G and G*, and the intensional (modal) 
> variants imposed by incompleteness, and all that is justified without using 
> more than the two axioms above. 
> 
> “My” theory is a sub theory of al scientific theories. 
> 
> Look at the conceptual progresses even just on physics:
> 
> Bohr:
>       - the wave equation (full arithmetic + analysis)
>       - a dualist unintelligible theory of mind.
> 
> Everett
>       - the wave equation (full arithmetic + analysis)
>       - Mechanism
> 
> Your servitor:
>       - arithmetic (a tiny part of arithmetic)
>       - Mechanism.
> 
> If “my" theory (which is actually a theorem showing that “my” theory is the 
> Universal machine theory) predicts everything, then all theories predict 
> everything.
> 
> I suspect that you have not really try to understand the theory. It is not 
> mine, it is the theory that any patient being can derive from mechanism and 
> computer science/arithmetic. The hard work have already be done by Gödel, 
> Kleene, Löb, and others. Two key theorems which summarise a lot are the two 
> theorem by Solovay, which summarise the theology of the machine in one modal 
> logic G*. Such question or read the papers if you want to really address the 
> “mechanist mind-body problem”.
> 
> Bruno
> 
> I am not motivated to study your theory. If all computation are possible, it 
> seems to imply, for example, that any G describes a possible Newtonian 
> gravity law, but can't tell is which G corresponds to our universe, let alone 
> show that Newton's law is just a weak field approximation of GR. AG 
> 
> Also, I don't believe that logic alone, with the postulates of arithmetic, 
> can distinguish one G from another,

I don’t know. If you are right on this, this entails that “G” is geographical. 
Of course, this comes from the fact that mechanism has to re-define the 
physical by the laws on the observable available to all universal numbers. If 
not, some non Turing elulable magic is brought in the theory of mind 
(implicitly).



> to obtain the weak field approximation of GR, aka Newtonian gravity; or that 
> the measured velocity of light is independent of the motions of source and 
> recipient. AG 
> 
> I got my answer, by default. AG 

?

Bruno




> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4313005b-46dd-40dc-af15-743643cee643o%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4313005b-46dd-40dc-af15-743643cee643o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8C7404B1-87E6-4F85-A309-BF11E0EC6730%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to