On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If there is no all encompassing purpose or a goal to existence and if >> the unknown principle responsible for the existence of the universe is not >> intelligent and is not conscious and is not a being then do you think it >> adds to clarity to call that principle "God"? >> > > > Yes, because it can still be something transcendent and responsible for > your existence, and having no name > And that's the problem, you insist on giving the thing with no name a name, and a ridiculously inappropriate one too! > And we can also remain open that it *might* be a person > And there *might* be a china teapot in orbit around the planet Uranus too, but I doubt it. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
