P.S. for Liz: TAKE NOTE! While you might be out of the running to be Edgar's companion, perhaps you might know some "non-feminist" women who could be?
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:26:02 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 wrote: > > *"SEEKING A COMPATIBLE WOMAN OR LONG TERM COMPANION:* I'm seeking a > compatible, loyal, caring, natural, affectionate, non-feminist woman who > believes that male female relationships should not be adversarial or > selfish, but based on mutual love, trust and benefit. Hopefully young and > healthy enough to be able to help me out through my old age. I'm also open > to the possibility of a long term possibly live in friend or companion to > share my house and help take care of things. Someone quiet, peaceful and > down to earth who appreciates my work and lifestyle would be ideal. That > could be either a man or woman or even a couple. If you are interested in > discussing this further or know someone who might be please feel free to > contact me at [email protected]. " > > And you said i didn't read things... > > On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:21:39 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >> >> Freq, >> >> But I have a life partner, a truly wonderful one. >> >> You? >> >> Edgar >> >> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:03:55 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 wrote: >>> >>> Also, I am really starting to understand why you have difficulty with >>> finding a life partner. >>> >>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:02:30 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 wrote: >>>> >>>> OK. >>>> >>>> http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adfm.201200640/abstract >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:56:09 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Freq, >>>>> >>>>> Yes it is too easy. Do you actually read anything before you respond? >>>>> Note I said "that could replace biological neurons one by one". >>>>> >>>>> Send me a few links referencing that being possible please.... >>>>> :-) >>>>> >>>>> Edgar >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:51:13 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:24:31 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jason, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are no 'synthetic neurons' that could replace biological ones >>>>>>> "one by one". When there are let me know and I'll check them out and >>>>>>> answer your question. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are letting your imagination run wild here imagining things with >>>>>>> no basis in reality as if they were true. When we study reality we >>>>>>> study >>>>>>> what is actually true, not sci fi no matter how 'cool' it's thought to >>>>>>> be.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Edgar >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> http://metabiological.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/first-synthetic-neuron-created/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.princeton.edu/pccmeducation/undergrad/reu/researchprojects/REU2008Presentations/duseja-richardson.pdf >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/hybrids.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.dvice.com/2012-12-2/worlds-most-complex-artificial-brain-ever-passes-iq-tests >>>>>> >>>>>> This is too easy... >>>>>> >>>>>> Does Edgar have a higher difficulty setting? >>>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
