Bruno and Brent,
please do not paint me as a Robert Rosen imitation. I have esteem for his
mind, but tried to go on from SOME of his thoughts in my own way.  He was a
mathematician and a biologist, I am none of those. His untimely death cut
his thoughts and I believe there would have been more to it if he continues
and publishes not only what may be compatible with a reductionist audience,
but ventures into agnosticism himself, beyond his 'model' limited to the
presently(?) knowbles.
At best I am a 'heretic' Rosenite, as I am a 'heretic Marchallite (if I may
say so).

Brent may be right with his "leading nowhere", which may be the itinery of
our present ignorance.

John M


On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:19 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:

>  On 1/8/2014 9:29 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
>  On 07 Jan 2014, at 23:20, John Mikes wrote:
>
>  Bruno, you made my day.
>
>  Reminds me of a Hungarian humorous author (P. Howard) who wrote about a
> blind philosopher (The Sleepy Elephant) and his assistant living in the
> deep Sahara - showing the Elephant's Life Oeuvre in a BIG book, the
> assistant was supposed to write as the old Blind Elephant dictated. It was
> all empty and the assistant asked somebody to inscribe: "I cannot write,
> but it makes him so happy when I pretend..." -
>
>
>  Lol
>
>
>
>  When reading your remarks I wonder what REALLY mean 'machine',  'comp',
>  'universal', and some more of your words I got used to over the past 2
> decades, yet are not "clear"(??) enough in my mind to automatically
> click-in when used.
> Do you have a *glossary *I could download, to refresh those (brief!)
> meanings?
>
>
>  I have no glossary. Maybe I should do that. I use each term in the most
> standard sense used by the expert in the field. Computable is made
> ultra-standard, if I can say, thanks to the Church thesis.
>
>  Let me try an explanation, below,  for the notions mentioned above.
>
>  (I am aware that you appreciate Robert Rosen critics of Church Thesis,
> but as you know I have some reservation that it is really a critics of
> Church thesis, as a critic of possible misuse of Church's thesis).
>
>
> I'd take Rosen as a cautionary example of holism leading nowhere.
>
> Brent
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to