On 9/9/2025 11:52 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Wednesday, September 10, 2025 at 12:08:39 AM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



    On 9/9/2025 10:36 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Tuesday, September 9, 2025 at 11:25:37 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker
    wrote:


        ...

    *
    *
    *If both twins are accelerating, then you've redefined the TP. *
    No.  But Blue does not accelerate while Red travels out and back.


*But earlier you claimed both Red and Blue have the same acceleration, and that's what your diagram shows. AG*
But not *"while Red travels out and back"*.  Which IS what my diagram shows.  You can imagine Blue as decelerating, landing on Earth, and then accelerating to join up again as Red comes back by. Next time read the whole sentence, not just up until a question occurs to you.


    *
    *
    *If you have two paths in spacetime, starting at the same point
    and ending at the same point, or at a  different point, how can
    you tell which is longer? AG *
    These are paths in /spacetime/.  They start and end at the same
    /event/, a point in 4-space.

*
*
*If the paradox is resolved, then the clocks should read different values when finally compared. So the end point events are NOT the same. AG*
The clock readings don't define events any more that odometer readings define distances.

    The obvious way to tell which is longer in proper time is to carry
    an ideal clock along the two paths and compare the measured
    intervals.  You could also measure the space distance X along the
    paths and and compute proper time S=\sqrt{T^2 - X^2}  where T is
    the coordinate time difference (in the same reference frame you
    measured distance).

    Brent

        *You seem to defying basic physics if this is your claim. I
        don't deny that the original problem can be restated in a
        way which avoids acceleration, and IMO this is what you've
        done. *
        But I've done more than that.  I've done it while maintaining
        exactly the same paradox.


*So you admit you're defying the laws of physics? AG *
Why?  Because something "seemed to defy basic physics" /to you/?  Can you explain how basic physics is defied?

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e41bc3c7-1560-448e-b0b8-af0cbc9686fb%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to