On Friday, September 12, 2025 at 2:27:20 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
What is obvious to me is that you aren't able to acknowledge any mistakes, *This is really dumb. I have several times acknowledged errors I've made, and No, everyone is NOT an abusive prick IMO. I asked you a simple question which you haven't answered. Are Brent's plots as obvious as he claims? No reply from you. When did you realize he had changed the TP in which the traveling twin is in a constant turnaround orbit? Or maybe you never realized that, or didn't study his diagrams. IMO, a few words of what exactly he was doing would have been helpful, but Brent has fallen in love with his diagrams. I asked Clark about how he supports the MWI on polarizer experiments, when his belief is based on S's equation which is nowhere in sight in those experiments. No replies after several inquiries. AG* everyone to you is an abusive prick, yet you never questioned the problem might be you. I have nothing else to add, it's not possible discussing with you, everyone else is a stupid prick, you’re right, you know, the others are stupid dead wrong... if only you and your genius could leave what's left of this list alone. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy Batty/Rutger Hauer) Le ven. 12 sept. 2025, 10:04, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit : On Friday, September 12, 2025 at 1:44:44 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote: It's always the real prick the most oblivious to his condition. *Someday you will have something of substance to add, but that day has yet to arrive. BTW, was it obvious to you that he was plotting a traveling twin in orbit and the clocks synchronized as they passed each other? AG * All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy Batty/Rutger Hauer) Le ven. 12 sept. 2025, 09:04, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit : On Thursday, September 11, 2025 at 10:41:59 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote: On 9/11/2025 7:08 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: On Thursday, September 11, 2025 at 7:58:36 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote: On 9/11/2025 12:39 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: On Thursday, September 11, 2025 at 1:16:02 PM UTC-6 John Clark wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 2:35 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: *why don't you spend a few minutes describing the main differences between the usual TP and this different one?* *Because if you can't be bothered to spend a few minutes watching the video then I can't be bothered to spend a few minutes making an inferior summary of that video. I can't easily provide snappy animations and illustrations needed to make things clearer. * *I did. I watched the first video and had a discussion with Brent about his alleged related solution, but I was finally turned off when he used the slingshot method for turnaround, but apparently couldn't explain how the traveling twin could start his adventure without accelerating. * You never asked that, and it's obvious from the diagram. Brent * I figured out that you could avoid acceleration entirely if the traveling twin is always in free fall and the clocks are synchronized when the traveler passes the resting twin. I don't recall you simply stating that, so I wouldn't have to decode your diagrams. What you left out is HOW the traveling twin gets into orbit. * I left out how he combs his hair too. Brent And that you're an arrogant prick who is under the illusion that your plots are *self-evident*. I suppose you go mute and can't simply say that your TP models a traveling twin in orbit, and that it replicates the original problem perfectly (if it does). AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3559525e-115e-42c8-99a5-9f962561a48bn%40googlegroups.com.
