On 9/7/2025 9:25 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Sunday, September 7, 2025 at 9:26:43 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



    On 9/7/2025 6:46 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Sunday, September 7, 2025 at 7:36:32 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



        On 9/7/2025 5:52 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


        On Sunday, September 7, 2025 at 2:29:11 PM UTC-6 Brent
        Meeker wrote:



            On 9/7/2025 12:12 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:

            *In reality, there surely IS acceleration, even though
            it might not be necessary to use it to solve the
            problem. Can the traveling twin return without
            acceleration? Of course not! AG*
            Actually he can.  All he has to do it slingshot around a
            distant planet in order to head back to Earth:

        *
        *
        *But that's NOT how the TP is defined! AG *

        What is this "defined"?  It's not /*defined*/ anywhere.


    *That's how it's described in almost any text one can find. You
    have a private definition. AG*

        It's just a thought experiment that was paradoxical in
        Newtonian mechanics.  Every version I've shown you is
        paradoxical in Newtonian mechanics /*in exactly the same
        way*/.  If you'd open you eyes and mind, you'd see that they
        give an intuitive grasp on why they all give the same answer
        in relativity and so resolve the same paradox





            You may object that he accelerated in turning around.
            */But general relativity teaches us that force free
            motion in a gravitational field is geodesic and there is
            no acceleration./*


        *So the traveling twin turns around without acceleration? AG *
        Read my last sentence above over again a few times.

        Brent

    *
    *
    *I did, initially. During the turnaround the motion is NOT force
    free, which GR allows, and one can apply the Equivalence
    Principle, and then time dilation. AG *
    You seemed to have missed GR 101 where it is explained that
    gravity is NOT a force.

    Brent

*
*
*It's your way or the highway. Or shall we say a touch of arrogance? Haven't you ever heard of the EP? Let me remind you. Gravity is locally equivalent to acceleration, so when the traveling twin accelerates, it's equivalent to being in a gravity field, where clock rates are slower compared to rest frames. *
But in the turnaround the time in the gravity field can be arbitrarily short compared to the the coasting phase before and after.

*Where did I use the word "force"? AG *

" During the turnaround the motion is NOT *force* free."

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5e6d3b1b-9d6c-4949-acd3-34a6b383ef24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to