On 9/7/2025 9:30 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Sunday, September 7, 2025 at 10:25:04 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:

    On Sunday, September 7, 2025 at 9:26:43 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



        On 9/7/2025 6:46 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


        On Sunday, September 7, 2025 at 7:36:32 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker
        wrote:



            On 9/7/2025 5:52 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


            On Sunday, September 7, 2025 at 2:29:11 PM UTC-6 Brent
            Meeker wrote:



                On 9/7/2025 12:12 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:

                *In reality, there surely IS acceleration, even
                though it might not be necessary to use it to solve
                the problem. Can the traveling twin return without
                acceleration? Of course not! AG*
                Actually he can.  All he has to do it slingshot
                around a distant planet in order to head back to Earth:

            *
            *
            *But that's NOT how the TP is defined! AG *

            What is this "defined"?  It's not /*defined*/ anywhere.


        *That's how it's described in almost any text one can find.
        You have a private definition. AG*

            It's just a thought experiment that was paradoxical in
            Newtonian mechanics.  Every version I've shown you is
            paradoxical in Newtonian mechanics /*in exactly the same
            way*/.  If you'd open you eyes and mind, you'd see that
            they give an intuitive grasp on why they all give the
            same answer in relativity and so resolve the same paradox





                You may object that he accelerated in turning
                around. */But general relativity teaches us that
                force free motion in a gravitational field is
                geodesic and there is no acceleration./*


            *So the traveling twin turns around without
            acceleration? AG *
            Read my last sentence above over again a few times.

            Brent

        *
        *
        *I did, initially. During the turnaround the motion is NOT
        force free, which GR allows, and one can apply the
        Equivalence Principle, and then time dilation. AG *
        You seemed to have missed GR 101 where it is explained that
        gravity is NOT a force.

        Brent

    *
    *
    *It's your way or the highway. Or shall we say a touch of
    arrogance? Haven't you ever heard of the EP? Let me remind you.
    Gravity is locally equivalent to acceleration, so when the
    traveling twin accelerates, it's equivalent to being in a gravity
    field, where clock rates are slower compared to rest frames. Where
    did I use the word "force"? AG *

*
*
*The traveler accelerates by applying a force, not by the force being applied by the gravitational field. Do you get it now? AG*

No.  The traveler uses the gravitational field of a planet to slingshot back around toward Earth.  No force, in the GR sense, at all. Get it now?...no of course not becuase you didn't spend a moments thought on the diagram I posted.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3aaa7cb1-3745-4511-b2d5-5f43f1df3fbf%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to