You're just debating religions. Nothing of what you say is actually real. On Tuesday, 6 May 2025 at 06:30:30 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote:
> On Monday, May 5, 2025 at 1:58:18 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 5/5/2025 5:36 AM, John Clark wrote: > > Time is not an operator because it is not an observable in the way that > position, momentum and energy are, instead it's a parameter, the stage > against which things happen. We can say that a particle has a position, a > momentum and an energy but a particle doesn't have a time. Mathematically > that means that in quantum mechanics position, momentum and energy are all > Hermitian operators but time is not. However it remains true that Δt × ΔE > ≥ ℏ/2, and of course Δx × Δp ≥ ℏ/2 > > > It remains true if you correctly interpret Δt as the time for the expected > value of the energy of the variable E to change by a standard deviation. > In other words by using whatever energy E refers to as a clock. That's why > it remains true even though there is no t operator in the sense of > measuring a universal time. > > Brent > > > If we're measuring the Casimir force between plates, how can that be a > clock? TY, AG > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e21ebb41-b670-448c-bb0b-3af4fc0c3134n%40googlegroups.com.
