It’s been a long time since I read the story but what I remember was the owner 
refused to get it inspected by Tesla. I believe the issue was finally resolved 


Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Sunday, December 11, 2022, 9:38 PM, (-Phil-) via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> 
wrote:

Varies from state to state, and I doubt any state that requires it has
inspectors qualified to make EV HV safety calls.

All Tesla cars built since late 2014 have enough self-diagnostic capability
to shut down if something goes wrong during supercharging.  (These changes
were made after a non-salvage Tesla caught fire at a supercharger)

Tesla's famous quality control is poor enough that without this
self-diagnostic capability we would have seen a lot more serious problems,
so a botched salvage repair is not going to really increase the danger.

On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 7:07 PM Robert Johnston via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org>
wrote:

> Don't salvaged and repaired cars need a safety inspection before they can
> be put back on the road and registered/insured?
>
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 at 20:48, Lawrence Winiarski via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hmmmmm....would gas stations refuse to give gas to salvaged cars because
> > the gas station might "burn down"?
> >
> >
> >    On Sunday, December 11, 2022 at 04:15:20 PM PST, paul dove via EV <
> > ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
> >
> >  That is not bricking a car! It will charge just not on. Supercharger.
> > This is to protect superchargers from burning down not to prevent
> repairs.
> > Like it or not they own the superchargers.
> >
> >
> > Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >
> >
> > On Sunday, December 11, 2022, 2:32 PM, Peri Hartman via EV <
> > ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
> >
> > Paul, I may have overstated my claim. But here's a partially relevant
> > reference:
> >
> >
> https://electrek.co/2020/02/12/tesla-disables-supercharging-salvaged-vehicles/
> > where Tesla has disabled supercharging on salvaged Teslas. I don't know
> > if they are still doing that.
> >
> > Regardless, my main point is Tesla (and others) *could* brick cars or
> > certain functionality. But I don't think they will because of enormous
> > public backlash.
> >
> > Peri
> >
> > << Annoyed by leaf blowers ? https://quietcleanseattle.org/ >>
> >
> > ------ Original Message ------
> > From: "paul dove" <dov...@bellsouth.net>
> > To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <ev@lists.evdl.org>
> > Cc: "Peri Hartman" <pe...@kotatko.com>
> > Sent: 11-Dec-22 11:14:10
> > Subject: Re: [EVDL] Goodbye old friend.
> >
> > >How in the world would you know Tesla bricks batteries? Gives some
> > >names and sources of you facts!
> > >
> > >
> > >Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> > ><https://more.att.com/currently/imap>
> > >
> > >On Sunday, December 11, 2022, 10:53 AM, Peri Hartman via EV
> > ><ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >>There's lots of malaise Tesla - and all the manufacturers, for that
> > >>matter - could impose. For example, certain sensors could "stop
> > >>working"
> > >>after some particular time. Or, the right rear door lock could stop
> > >>functioning properly. In the worst case, they could brick the car. It
> > >>may be difficult to determine whether such problems are caused by a
> > >>software disabling action or if something actually failed. However, I
> > >>am
> > >>not too concerned. If a manufacturer actually imposed such behaviors,
> > >>and were caught, they would be heavily punished. And, that would be
> > >>regardless of what the fine print in the purchase agreement said.
> > >>
> > >>I am aware that Tesla has bricked cars, or at least batteries put into
> > >>non Tesla cars. It does get into a grey area: what modifications are
> > >>you
> > >>allowed to do and what not ? Different discussion.
> > >>
> > >>I understand, from the manufacturer's point of view, that they want
> > >>and
> > >>need to control the software in the car. For the most part, I think
> > >>that's an advantage to all of us. The problem is, we have to trust
> > >>them
> > >>to not do anything to break functionality in the future. Time will
> > >>tell,
> > >>I guess.
> > >>
> > >>Peri
> > >>
> > >><< Annoyed by leaf blowers ? https://quietcleanseattle.org/ >>
> > >>
> > >>------ Original Message ------
> > >>From: "John Lussmyer via EV" <ev@lists.evdl.org>
> > >>To: "Mr. Sharkey via EV" <ev@lists.evdl.org>
> > >>Cc: "John Lussmyer" <cou...@casadelgato.com>
> > >>Sent: 11-Dec-22 08:29:19
> > >>Subject: Re: [EVDL] Goodbye old friend.
> > >>
> > >> >On 12/11/2022 8:18 AM, Mr. Sharkey via EV wrote:
> > >> >>Oh sure, I get that. Problem is, they came on at first promising
> > >>affordable transportation. Then the Musk-cult mentality took over, and
> > >>now they produce high-end vehicles for people with disposable income
> > >>who don't mind laying it out for something most of the rest of us
> > >>can't -or won't- afford.
> > >> >So you are saying that they should first produce a cheaper very low
> > >>profit margin vehicle - so that they won't have enough cash to grow
> > >>production at a high rate and be able to product a LOT more vehicles?
> > >> >_______________________________________________
> > >> >Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
> > >> >No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> > >> >HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
> > >>No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> > >>HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
> > >>
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <
> >
> http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20221211/70e6b8bf/attachment.htm
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
> > No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> > HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <
> >
> http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20221211/2f5066a5/attachment.htm
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
> > No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> > HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
> >
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <
> >
> http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20221212/8e1bd026/attachment.htm
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
> > No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> > HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
> >
> >
>
> --
> Robert "Anaerin" Johnston
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20221211/0cb3f895/attachment.htm
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20221211/0771421b/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20221212/dfd698cd/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/

Reply via email to