>Remember how the BEV industry was just 10 years ago, 20 years ago, and 30
>years and more ago.
>Back then, while pushing for years for a ZEV mandate, I heard many of the same
>arguments used by the auto and oil companies >about BEVs as I have heard for
>several years about hydrogen.
- Mark
People smarter than me did the math and it proves that BEV will work very well.
Then the cars were built and it works well. People smarter than me have also
done the math on hydrogen and proven that it does work but at a rate that is
more expensive in all respects not to mention metal embrittlement allowing
hydrogen to escape and possibly explode. So many problems including hydrogen
escape. Since hydrogen is the smallest particle there is a natural loss. The
hydrogen dead end is so obvious it is troubling that there is a lobby. Simply
hydrogen is a way that the energy stream might be privatized and monetized in
favor of the owner not the user as electric is. Electricity: you can make it
yourself, plug in yourself store it yourself. Hydrogen is financially
exorbitant for personal use. All the same problems that you have with the
gasoline economy you have with hydrogen. Why? Oh yes...range anxiety. Barn
muck also works as a fuel source...do you see a horseshit lobby? Actually
there is. So find your niche and stay there. See if it works but stop trying
to take over BEV. It works. It will win. Stop the hydrogen diversion. Wishes
are not reality. Solar cars are probably the future but so far few believe me.
Lawrence Rhodes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20181226/d9e924a9/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
