You said 1-4%. We weren't talking about solar on the house, but on the car. 
Wasn't that the point.

I would use the S&P index for a comparative rate of return. *Every* rate is 
based on a commensurate risk, but I don't consider the S&P risky over the long 
term, and we *are* talking about long term returns, aren't we?

I can't advise you what to do with *your* investments, as everyone has 
different needs, but these days a safe high dividend paying stock will give you 
better and relatively safe returns.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 22, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Robert Bruninga <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Most investments pay more than that. Using bank interest as an
> indication in this low interest rate environment isn't appropriate.
> 
> Huh?  Tell me where?  I have a CD at 2.2% and my advisor said hang on to
> it, since she knows of no other similar secure investment rate.  The other
> CD is at 1.9% and same thing.  She says that is about the same or better
> than she can get.  My bank pays 0.8%.
> 
> Sure there are better rates but at commensurately higher risk.  But there
> is nothing more guaranteed and secure than the sun and solar.  Period.
> 10 to 18% return on your solar panel investment on one's house. For
> example.   Bob
> 
> On Sep 22, 2015, at 9:55 AM, Robert Bruninga via EV <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>>> Sounds like yearly payback is somewhere between $10.00 and $40.00.
>>> Sounds kind of small for an investment of more than $1000.
>> 
>> That's 1% to 4%.  Better than most banks.  And FAR better for the
>> future since it displaces X amount of coal burning.
>> 
>> So if it is equal or better than most other investments, AND it is
>> definitely better than using coal electricity for ALL of us, then many
>> would jump at the chance.
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>> On September 22, 2015 7:19:43 AM MDT, EVDL Administrator via EV
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 22 Sep 2015 at 3:50, brucedp5 via EV wrote:
>>> 
>>>> ? Is this a useful product worthy of the co$t, or is it a profitable
>>>> feel-good add-on for bragging-rights ?
>>> 
>>> Much of the answer is right in the story:
>>> 
>>>> As a yearly average, the system generates 29 percent of the total
>>> energy
>>>> required to drive eight miles per day in West Palm Beach, Fla. That
>>> reduces
>>>> the energy needed to recharge the battery by 29 percent. Results may
>>> vary
>>>> depending on area and usage.
>>>> 
>>>> By continually transferring energy to the batteries, the panels
>>>> limit
>>> how deep
>>>> into the battery reserve a vehicle must go during a typical use.
>>> 
>>> I suspect this is a best-case estimate.  Let's run some numbers.
>>> 
>>> First let me warn you that there's a fair bit of hand-waving here.
>>> I'm not an expert in these matters.  If you're a PV expert and can
>>> come up with
>>> 
>>> better numbers than mine, by all means please do so.
>>> 
>>> IIRC a typical golf car range is around 40-50 miles.  Using standard
>>> T105
>>> type batteries this amounts to an energy usage of between 126 and 158
>>> Wh/mi.
>>> Let's call it 150 Wh/mi for convenience.
>>> 
>>> Driving 8 miles per day will require 1200 WH per day or (1200 * 365)
>>> ==
>>> 
>>> 438000 Wh/year if you drive the car every day (as the PR release
>>> seems to suggest).
>>> 
>>> This panel can produce 100 watts, but if that's a typical rating
>>> it'll only apply when the golf car is parked in the sun with the sun
>>> directly overhead.
>>> At other times the output will be lower, but I'm not a solar expert
>>> so I don't know by how much.  I'll take a wild guess and estimate
>>> that the panel will average 30 watts over an average day's sunshine
>>> (including dawn and dusk).  Someone please correct me if that's too far
> off.
>>> 
>>> So that's 30W * 12h == 360 Wh/day * 234 days (average sunny days per
>>> year in West Palm Beach) == 84240 Wh/year.  This is 19% of the energy
>>> required to drive 8 miles per day, about a third less than Club Car
>>> claim, but surprisingly close.
>>> 
>>> But even my 19% estimate assumes the golf car will be in the sun any
>>> time the sun is shining.  If you park it in a garage, or in the shade
>>> of a building or tree, it gains little or nothing.  How many people
>>> deliberately park their cars (golf or otherwise) in the sun on a hot
>>> summer day in Florida?
>>> 
>>> Other factors will affect solar gain.  For example, if you drive it
>>> on a tree lined street, or a city street with tall buildings around
>>> it, it will gain less solar energy.
>>> 
>>> So, is this just a "feel-good add-on"?  Well ... as with any other
>>> vehicle option, how much a given user gains from this one depends on
>>> where and how she drives.  But for most users, I'd say it'll probably
>>> yield more bragging rights than range.
>>> 
>>> What it MIGHT do that's potentially at least as useful -- IF you park
>>> mostly in the sun --- is dribble a little charge back into the
>>> battery when the car isn't being driven.  That'll improve battery
>>> cycle life a bit.
>>> Calculating
>>> whether the resulting battery cost savings will offset the cost of
>>> the PV panel will be left as an exercise for the reader. ;-)
>>> 
>>> FWIW, in looking for info on this I ran across several dealers
>>> offering
>>> 
>>> aftermarket PV panel options for golf cars.  One claimed a (peak)
>>> output of
>>> 220 watts.  The price was $1450.
>>> 
>>> Is it worth it?  I see 12v 50w generic PV panels on Ebay for around
>>> $100
>>> each.  Five of them would give you peak 250W into a charge controller.
>>> 
>>> Speaking of which, I see 48v, 30-45 amp charge controllers on Ebay at
>>> prices from $160 to $260.
>>> 
>>> The dealer I mentioned above also provide a roof frame and struts.
>>> What do
>>> you think that's worth, maybe $150?   So they're making around $700 on
>>> each
>>> kit.  That's a 100% return on the parts cost.  Not too shabby.
>>> 
>>> David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
>>> EVDL Administrator
>>> 
>>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = EVDL
>>> Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>>> Note: mail sent to "evpost" and "etpost" addresses will not reach me.
>>> To send a private message, please obtain my email address from the
>>> webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
>>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>>> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/ Please discuss EV
>>> drag racing at NEDRA
>>> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/ Please discuss EV drag
>> racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>> _______________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/ Please discuss EV drag
>> racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/ Please discuss EV drag
> racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> 
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to