On 19 May 2015 at 22:52, jerry freedomev via EV wrote:
> Hi Arak and all, Well you did say that since EV's didn't fit 30% of the
> population needs it wasn't good on an EV list kind of should expect
> blowback.
Well said Jerry, but Arak isn't listening. Thus challenged, he got indignant
and unsubscribed. :-(
Let us not forget the immortal Fidonet Principles:
Thou shalt not be too annoying.
Thou shalt not be too easily annoyed.
I'm sympathetic with some of his points, though. Most of us here don't
think EVs have to manage all the missions and trips that ICEVs can, but
we're not normal vehicle buyers. The average person is not going to pay an
ICEV price for a car that does less and covers fewer of his transporation
needs than an ICEV does. That's just normal, rational consumer behavior.
To really take off, EVs that look and cost like ICEVs have to work like
ICEVs. EVs that don't, don't. Hint, hint.
David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
EVDL Administrator
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
EVDL Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Note: mail sent to "evpost" and "etpost" addresses will not
reach me. To send a private message, please obtain my
email address from the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
