Peter Yee <pe...@akayla.com> wrote:
    > RFC 7170bis (see
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis/) - given
    > new learnings on what does and does not interoperate in the real world,
    > this document is going to be pulled back from the RFC Editor's queue
    > (already held for MISSINGREF) for some trimming (of things that aren't
    > done in the real world) and rewording (to make clearer what is known to
    > work). Those things that are trimmed out might come back in a TEAPv2
    > specification that improves upon 7170/7170bis with the way we would
    > like things to work in the real world.

I'm document shepherd and I suggested we do this on the list.
I'm very pleased to see this result.
Sorry, I couldn't be in the room at the time.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list -- emu@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to emu-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to