Based on the feedback seen during the adoption call, I believe we can safely 
say that the consensus is overwhelmingly in favor of adopting EAP-EDHOC. Thank 
you to everyone who expressed an opinion during the adoption call.

Once the new EMU charter is finalized and approved, we will formally request a 
WG version of the EAP-EDHOC draft. Of course, discussion about and refinement 
of the personal can continue before that.

                -Joe and Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Yee <pe...@akayla.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 10:37 AM
To: emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Adoption call for EAP-EDHOC

Off-by-one-bug. That deadline is December 13th!

                -Peter

On 11/29/23, 9:13 AM, "Peter Yee" <pe...@akayla.com <mailto:pe...@akayla.com>> 
wrote:


This is an adoption call for EAP-EDHOC (draft-ingles-eap-edhoc) [1].
This draft was originally briefed in Yokohama and while it didn't receive 
strong backing at that time, a short re-airing in Prague showed that there's 
distinct interest in taking on this work. While this work is not currently in 
scope for the EMU WG, it’s definitely something we could take on under a 
rechartering of the WG.


So, if you've got interest in seeing the work adopted, please
formalize that by responding to the EMU mailing list with your
position. We are particularly interested in hearing from parties
who are willing to review and/or contribute to the development
of the specification.


The deadline for feedback is November 13th. We hope to hear
from lots of you.


Joe and Peter


1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ingles-eap-edhoc/ 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ingles-eap-edhoc/>
















_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to