I support adoption. I'll review it for any general EAP issues. I have less confidence in my ability to review any cryptography.
> On Nov 29, 2023, at 12:13 PM, Peter Yee <pe...@akayla.com> wrote: > > This is an adoption call for EAP-EDHOC (draft-ingles-eap-edhoc) [1]. > This draft was originally briefed in Yokohama and while it didn't > receive strong backing at that time, a short re-airing in Prague > showed that there's distinct interest in taking on this work. While > this work is not currently in scope for the EMU WG, it’s definitely > something we could take on under a rechartering of the WG. > > So, if you've got interest in seeing the work adopted, please > formalize that by responding to the EMU mailing list with your > position. We are particularly interested in hearing from parties > who are willing to review and/or contribute to the development > of the specification. > > The deadline for feedback is November 13th. We hope to hear > from lots of you. > > Joe and Peter > > 1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ingles-eap-edhoc/ > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
