Hi Michael, Apologies for the late reply.
> > The IANA Considerations section needs to include the "Domain Name > > Reservation Considerations" sub-section described in Section 5 of RFC > > 6761 (we’ve failed to ask for this in recent years). > > Hi, thanks for the suggestion! > > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-richardson-emu-eap- > onboarding-03.txt > > Name: draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding > Revision: 03 > Title: EAP defaults for devices that need to onboard > Document date: 2023-04-02 > Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft- > richardson-emu-eap-onboarding-03 > > We've added section 7.1, with the template filled in. > Is this the right way to do this? 7. has the IANA request, with a > subsection > doing the template. > (to be clear: eap.arpa requires *no* processing changes in any DNS > places. It's just a unique name that we need as a REALM) Yes, this works for us. Thanks! Amanda _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
