Amanda Baber via RT <iana-iss...@iana.org> wrote:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding
> The IANA Considerations section needs to include the "Domain Name
> Reservation Considerations" sub-section described in Section 5 of RFC
> 6761 (we’ve failed to ask for this in recent years).
Hi, thanks for the suggestion!
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding-03.txt
Name: draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding
Revision: 03
Title: EAP defaults for devices that need to onboard
Document date: 2023-04-02
Diff:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding-03
We've added section 7.1, with the template filled in.
Is this the right way to do this? 7. has the IANA request, with a subsection
doing the template.
(to be clear: eap.arpa requires *no* processing changes in any DNS
places. It's just a unique name that we need as a REALM)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
