I think I owe a second PR on handling request action TLVs, and I may have found a small inconsistency that we should at least discuss.  See next message.

Eliot

On 04.04.23 16:59, Alan DeKok wrote:
On Mar 30, 2023, at 1:06 PM, Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote:
This is one of two PRs I said I would deliver.  There is now text for CSR 
attributes in TEAP.[1]  As we discussed in the WG meeting, I have linked that 
work to the LAMPS draft on CSR Attributes.  The text essentially leverages RFC 
7030 with one modification- there is no need to based64 encode/decode.

I've also modified the appropriate table to indicate how and when it can be 
offered.  This is sort of treated as a request by the server in that table, but 
really it is an informational element. The client will be doing something 
similar for identity-type because it will be sending what would otherwise be a 
gratuitious response.  What's important for implementations is simply to note 
the values of the TLVs in each case, as now further protocol machinery is 
invoked.

Could you please review this text?
   I think it looks good.  I'll merge it in shortly.

I have also opened up one new issue.  It became clear in the meeting that we 
have an additional deficit in the draft, which is that there is no example flow 
for PKCS#10/PKCS#7 transactions.  I would like to add that flow, and so I 
opened an issue.  I am hoping to provide that text in the next week or so as 
well.
   Sounds good, thanks.

   I also need to add text on the Identity-Hint TLV.   And after that I think 
the document is pretty much done.

   Are there any other issues we need to address?  The EMU minutes aren't up 
yet, but I think that's it.

   Alan DeKok,



_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to