On Mar 31, 2022, at 10:05 AM, Oleg Pekar <oleg.pekar.2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It looks like RADIUS RFC 2865, Section "5. Attributes" is ambiguous when it > talks about the attribute value size: > > First it says: "The Value field is zero or more octets", then it provides 5 > possible value data types none of which allows a zero length value.
Yeah. :( It's horrible. > Section "5.26. Vendor-Specific" also says about the value of a > vendor-specific attribute "The String field is one or more octets". > > Thus the RFC allows empty values for attributes in general but prohibits for > any declared types of the attributes. Yes. RADIUS is weird and terrible. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
