On Jun 2, 2020, at 10:54 PM, Barry Leiba via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > — Section 2 — > > This section updates [RFC5247] ... > It further > defines Session-ID derivation for PEAP. > > This section does not address PEAP; that’s done in Section 3. I suggest > removing that last sentence.
Done. > — Section 3 — > > [RFC5247] did not define Session-Id definition for Microsoft's > Protected EAP (PEAP). For consistency with EAP-TLS the definition > given in [RFC5216] Section 2.3, we define it as: > > Both sentences here need some fixing: > > NEW > [RFC5247] did not define Session-Id for Microsoft's > Protected EAP (PEAP). For consistency with the EAP-TLS definition > given in [RFC5216] Section 2.3, we define it as: > END Done. Thanks. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
