Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- — Section 2 — This section updates [RFC5247] ... It further defines Session-ID derivation for PEAP. This section does not address PEAP; that’s done in Section 3. I suggest removing that last sentence. — Section 3 — [RFC5247] did not define Session-Id definition for Microsoft's Protected EAP (PEAP). For consistency with EAP-TLS the definition given in [RFC5216] Section 2.3, we define it as: Both sentences here need some fixing: NEW [RFC5247] did not define Session-Id for Microsoft's Protected EAP (PEAP). For consistency with the EAP-TLS definition given in [RFC5216] Section 2.3, we define it as: END _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
