On Jul 25, 2019, at 7:34 AM, John Mattsson <john.matts...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > Minor comments on the 01 version. Otherwise I think the document is ready for > WGLC.
Thanks. > - I agree with Mohit that the title should be changed to something like > "EAP Session-Id Derivation for EAP-SIM, EAP-AKA, and PEAP" Done. > - Abstracts in RFCs cannot have references. [RFC5247] and [AKAP] need to be > removed. The names still need to be there, I think. But they shouldn't be references. > - The following sentences in the abstract and intro will have to change > before publishing. > > "EAP Session-Id derivation has not been defined for EAP-SIM, EAP-AKA, > and EAP-AKA' when using the fast re-authentication exchange instead > of full authentication." > > I suggest to just remove EAP-AKA' (The document already talks about > RFC5448bis). > > "EAP Session-Id derivation has not been defined for EAP-SIM and EAP-AKA, > when using the fast re-authentication exchange instead > of full authentication." Done. > - The sentence in the abstract about EAP-AKA' should be in the document body > as well. > > "Since [AKAP] defines the Session-ID for EAP-AKA', the definition for > EAP-AKA' is not included here." Done with some minor word smithing. > - "TLS 1.2 or earlier is used" -> "TLS 1.2 is used" > > The TLS wg document draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate (Submitted to IESG > for Publication) formally prohibits negotiation and use of TLS 1.0 > and TLS 1.1. It also updates all RFCs that use TLS. I suppose so. I do suspect, tho, that there are millions of end user devices doing EAP which don't support TLS 1.2. > - "deriviation" -> "derivation" > > - "EAP-SIM, and EAP-AKA" -> "EAP-SIM and EAP-AKA" Fixed, thanks. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
