> -----Original Message----- > From: Alan DeKok [mailto:al...@deployingradius.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 5:15 AM > To: Hoeper Katrin-QWKN37 > Cc: Stephen Hanna; Glen Zorn; emu@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization > > Hoeper Katrin-QWKN37 wrote: > > Here's the open issue (as I see it from previous posts to the list): > ... > > Is this the only issue that people are having with the draft? > > If so, I'd be interested if 1) there is a group consensus to remove the > > authorization feature and 2) whether removing this feature solves all > > open issues with the draft. > > I believe that this feature is useful enough to warrant mentioning in > the draft. > > If there is objection, we can have a WG consensus call on this issue. > [KH] I like this idea! Let's do it :) > Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Dave Nelson
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Dave Nelson
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Stefan Winter
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Stephen Hanna
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Hoeper Katrin-QWKN37
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Hoeper Katrin-QWKN37
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Stephen Hanna
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Dave Nelson
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Stephen Hanna
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Dan Harkins
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Dan Harkins
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Stephen Hanna
- Re: [Emu] EAP and authorization Dan Harkins