trešd., 2026. g. 30. sept., plkst. 19:24 — lietotājs Nicklas SB Karlsson (<[email protected]>) rakstīja: > > ons 2026-09-30 klockan 10:35 +0100 skrev andy pugh: > > > > What _might_ work would be for the INI file to define the position (in > > machine coordinates) of the rotational axes. (or, to be more specific, > > the location of the axis of each of the rotary axes) > Why? > If I think right tool length compensation is however important. > > Feed is the plane perpendicular to tool direction. Excluding movement along > tool direction and move along three > more degree of freedom tool length compensation is important to get it right. >
Just a small note - it seems to me that initial question and Andy's suggestion is about rotary axis which rotates the workpiece - IMHO tool length compensation would work correctly. OTOH your suggestion looks to be related to tool being rotated in machine coordinate system which does make things a lot more complicated Viesturs. _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
