On Tuesday 04 April 2017 06:28:31 andy pugh wrote:

> On 4 April 2017 at 10:47, Andrew <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I exported the model to STL and feed it to a slicer.
> > It shows ~0,5kg and ~8hrs printing time with 0,45mm layer and 10%
> > infill
>
> But that is 8 hours per part (if using lost-PLA) whereas my
> conventional pattern can be re-used.
>
> This thread seems to have drifted badly. I have made a pattern, the
> pattern is at the foundry.
> My question was how many parts I should have made. It would make
> little sense for anyone to use my design file rather than one
> optimised for their requirements, there is about 45 minutes of work in
> that model, irrelevant compared to printing, machining or
> pattern-making time.
>
> If you are interested in conventional pattern-making, then I have some
> friends who restore old vehicles and so a lot of it:
> http://hmvf.co.uk/forumvb/showthread.php?13514-WW1-Thornycroft-restora
>tion&p=486322#post486322 For example.

Interesting, using a wooden mockup.  Nice work.  So that is a hint that 
if I print this cover, I should do 2 of them, 1 to put on the shelf for 
taking to the foundry if the best  of the 2 breaks, take the 2nd one to 
the foundry.

Thanks Andy.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to