I thought that was "hanging chad" rather than "shard".
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chad_(paper)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Bentzinger [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 1:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] What does "CNC" really mean?
>
> CNC is one of those acronyms that we are stuck with.
>
> The more things chance the more they stay the same.
>
> The term "Horseless Carriage' has mostly died out except here in Colorado
> where they still issue legacy "Horseless Carriage" license plates for
extremely
> old vehicles. But today they still call the 4 wheelers a CAR (riage) and
Auto-
> mobile.
>
> Note that in G-Code we still use M2 to indicate the end of a program and
many
> machines still use M30 which was the original M-Code to start the rewind
of
> the NC paper tape back to the leader section. The % sign was used to
indicate
> the end of the feed leader and beginning of the actual program. At the
tail end
> the % told the teltype to punch the trailing leader (3' to 7' different
machine
> readers had different needs).
>
>
> A good way to describe the differences between CNC and NC would be that
you
> could not edit an NC program. If there were changes you could load a tape,
line
> by line, via teletype with tape reader, add or remove commands by typing
them
> in as a new tape was made. Another legacy factor that still haunts us is
that NC
> code did not support cutter compensation and was all spindle center. Most
> CAD/CAM systems still program this way only using G41/G42 for very minor
> wear corrections. ( hang the lazy b@$tards )
>
>
> An NC tape reading control - that would read a single line of code and
execute
> it, then advance the tape reading the next line and execute etc. BTW this
is also
> where the history of the term Single block came from, not allowing the
tape
> reader to read the next line until you pressed the start button. A 2 axis
control
> unit was the size of a US family home refrigerator, or 1m x 1m x 2m for
those
> elsewhere in the world.
>
> I still have a few coffee cans full of the Aluminum 35mm film cans with
many of
> the punched tapes I had to make in College to earn the title of CNC
Machinist
> and programmer.
>
> Anyone remember Florida and the issue of "Dangling shards". That is the
horror
> story of paper tape. Once you made a good part. Cut and passed QC
inspection
> you ran the paper tape back through and punched good quality mylar tape
that
> was dependable.
>
> Now, slowly we might see CNC fade out. I see 3D printer and pick and place
> machines that have just a 2 line display and loads program via USB or SDHC
> card and just runs, no provisions for editing at the machine itself.
>
> In the very high end manufacturing machines I could see a single control
> terminal running an entire flexible machining cell, or even multiple
cells. Likely
> it would use a tablet device as a slave to allow remote access when
setting up a
> specific machine.
>
> Automation doesn't really put too many people out of work, it just shifts
job
> titles and responsibilities. Switching over to robots to load and unload
> machines caused a huge improvement in quality since the part to part time
> interval was consistent, as well as less dropped parts and a cleaner work
> environment for operators. It provided time for operators to do actual
> measurements vs depending on simple go/nogo gages.
>
> Greg, Out yonder in Colorado
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to