On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:51 AM, andy pugh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25 November 2011 10:51, Peter Blodow <[email protected]> wrote: > > Andy, you hit me severely there. My respect to all developers and > > programmers of EMC, but I am sure there is a large silent majority of > > EMC users who participate without writing to the list, just reading and > > enjoying. > > Indeed, my point is that those are the people who we should consider > when choosing an OS to base the LiveCD on. > > I have been a fairly hardcore user of Linux, RTAI, realtime linux, and for that matter emc from back in the old source tarball days. My preference is to continue using Ubuntu for the livecd unless there is a real crisis. As Andy says, it's not that hard to install emc2 on another machine if you are moderately skilled at using Linux. I have really gotten used to apt-get installs, and I hate building from source. Even the most minimal source build seems to require ridiculous dependency hassles that just aren't worth it to me any more. Unless you get the source package from a distribution, of course. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
