On 25 November 2011 10:51, Peter Blodow <[email protected]> wrote: > Andy, you hit me severely there. My respect to all developers and > programmers of EMC, but I am sure there is a large silent majority of > EMC users who participate without writing to the list, just reading and > enjoying.
Indeed, my point is that those are the people who we should consider when choosing an OS to base the LiveCD on. > I surely have an opinion on EMC and the OS it's running on. Are you only > considering computer freaks to be worthy of participating? Absolutely not. I am saying that most of the people suggesting that we run on RedHat or Debian or Puppy or Poky because they are doing so, and like it, would be running on that distro regardless of the choice of OS used on the LiveCD. Hence, for those people the LiveCD OS is irrelevant, and suggesting that their favourite super-hardcore OS is best of the liveCD is missing the point of who the LiveCD is aimed at. Actually, I am disproving my own point here, as I am posting here, and have no intention of ever using anything other than a LiveCD OS, as I have very little clue about Linux, I am a Mac user. -- atp The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
