OK, so it wasn't as private as I intended ..  sorry everyone ...

On 3/15/2010 12:11 AM, Dave wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> You sent me that EMC2 post for Featurecam a while back and that is
> working out fine.  Thanks.
>
> I ran into an unexpected problem with Featurecam the other day.    We
> installed another copy on my customers machine and when we moved the .fm
> file from one machine to another, in one case it totally trashed the
> tool table.  I didn't even realize it until the lathe that was running
> the code did a tool change to an empty turret position and then since
> all off the offsets were zero the machine fortunately stopped.
>
> Have you had any problems moving Featurecam files from machine to
> machine?   I haven't checked out the Featurecam website yet, but I was
> really surprised when this happened late last week.
>
> Other than that, Featurecam has been working great.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> On 3/14/2010 9:01 PM, Steve Blackmore wrote:
>    
>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:59:40 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>      
>>> If the existing robot control already works, then there is no sense in
>>> trying to control that with EMC2 directly.
>>>
>>> I'd tie EMC2 together with the robot controls via digital I/O, or the
>>> Modbus interface via Classic Ladder. The interface should be pretty
>>> simple and consist of just a few handshake lines.
>>>
>>> Lathe Output ->   Ready to load ->   Robot input
>>> Robot output ->   Release Chuck ->   Lathe input
>>> Lathe output ->   Chuck Released ->   Robot input
>>> Robot output ->   Part ready to chuck ->   Lathe input
>>> Lathe output ->   Chuck clamped ->   Robot input
>>> Robot output ->   Robot clear of lathe ->   Lathe input
>>> Lathe output ->   Lathe busy ->   Robot input
>>>
>>>        
>> I'd agree with Dave here.
>>
>>
>>      
>>>> Request for a price quote from a potential client ended with a
>>>> revelation to me that i have to find a way to decrease the production
>>>> cost and that involves also reduction of labor time.
>>>>
>>>>          
>> You're right in my bread and butter zone here<G>
>>
>> Firstly I'd look at the lathe code, see if it can be improved on, then
>> look at the feeds/speeds and tooling and see if that can be improved
>> within the capabilities of the machine. The crossing point for
>> production speed to cost is the secret. It's sometimes more cost
>> effective to run slower and tooling last longer than to run flat out
>> with increased tool/machine wear and more frequent insert replacement.
>>
>> Any good CAM program should be able to optimise the code, but I still
>> find I can shave a little off any CAM programs job times manually.
>> Whether they can recoup my charge for doing that within their job cycle
>> lifetime is their problem ;)
>>
>> Steve Blackmore
>> --
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emc-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>
>>
>>      
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>    


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to