On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 08:33:40AM -0700, Dave Engvall wrote: > > On Sep 3, 2009, at 4:05 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote: > <snip> > Hi Erik, > I'm told the hal pin is a side effect of the following error. > > I googled "nano2count" and got hits but nothing that looked useful. > Your search ability is probably better than mine.
Thanks Dave. I wasn't worried too much about the hal pin, since it looked more effect than cause, as you say. Grubbing about, I see here: http://www.linuxcnc.org/component/option,com_kunena/Itemid,20/func,view/catid,27/id,160/limit,6/limitstart,6/lang,en/ That Alex Joni informs us: "That's just a warning, that it doesn't contain a version, and it taints the kernele. Nothing to be worried about." [Referring to the: "rtapi: no version for "nano2count" found: kernel tainted." gumpf.] It seems to be quite common, and not instrumental in my initial emc take-off attempt running nose-first into the fence at the end of the runway. This is probably better than it working first off, because I learn more stuff on the way. (Like how to back emc onto the runway for another run with my arms flapping.) Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
