Speaking in general – not acquainted with any work specific to your concern.

 

The real antenna is/are the IC (s) covered by the shield, and any internal 
connections between them.

 

If you properly simulate that, you need not worry about the effect of the 
shield on the antenna, because it will be the same whether real or simulated.

 

Seems to me your antenna is a PCB trace or traces.  I‘m thinking that they 
would not be much affected by the presence/absence of the BLS.

 

-- 

Ken Javor

(256) 650-5261

 

From: Chas Grasso <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Chas Grasso <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, July 21, 2023 at 2:38 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [PSES] Simulation of signal source under a pwb shield

 

Hello experts and gurus!!


I need to simulate the performance of a BLS (board level shield) and I am 
considering
using the IEEE Std 2716-2022 IEEE Guide for the Characterization of the 
Effectiveness of Printed Circuit Board Level Shielding document. This document 
is however an adaptation of 
the methods of evaluating gaskets rather than a focused guide on BLS 
performance.

Question: Does anyone have experience using this Guide as intended for a BLS 
solution evaluation? 

Another Question: Would someone guide me to a paper or experiment that shows 
a decent correlation of a simulated source in a BLS versus actual measurements ?


Here's my concern: The problem of how to internally  source a signal for 
simulation and
measurement seems deceptively simple. Just put an antenna on the inside of the 
shield - right? Well, no. My concern is that the addition of the shield 
compromises 
the antenna characteristics and so inadvertently this results in better (or 
worse) results.

 

With eager anticipation and appreciation for your help with this!!

-- 

Charles Grasso

Dish Technologies

 (c) 303-204-2974

(w) 303-706-5467

(h) 303-317-5530

(e ) [email protected]

(e2) [email protected]

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All 
emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/ 
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected]
Rick Linford at: [email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: [email protected] 

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected]
Rick Linford at: [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to