Agree.  But at 145 MHz, cable is electrically long.  In order to compare
before and after, need to measure at exactly the same location, on account
of standing waves, unless you used an absorbing clamp, in which case no
issue.


Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261



From: Amund Westin <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Amund Westin <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:38:50 +0200
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [PSES] Radiated emission - troubleshooting with current clamp

We did some EMC testing last week (radiated emission in a chamber) on a
ventilation system with two fans. It exceeded the limits on 145MHz.
 
Then outside the camber, we shut down the fans, we found the 145MHz on a bus
line from a controller (3rd part product). Connecting the fans back again,
the noise increase with increasing speed on the fans. Broadband noise at
145MHz.
 
The troubleshooting process have been carried out outside the chamber (due
to costs). We had a current clamp connected to a spectrum analyzer and
measured every internal cable.
145MHz was only visible on the bus line and the cables to the fans (which
are 2 meters long, unshielded).
 
We inserted a CM choke on the bus line, and the 145MHz on the fan cable
decreased by approximate 5 dB (current clamp meas.). What this would mean in
decreased level under a radiated test, it¹s hard to say.
 
We are planning to check it out in the chamber next time.
During that exercise, we will also prepare a better bonding of the fan
cables to the chassis in order to reduse the radiated fields from the fan
cables. Also have a shielded harness.
 
Do you agree that the current clamp + spectrum analyzer, is a good tool for
finding the noise and the wires that may act as antennas?
 
 
Best regards
Amund 
 
 
 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]>



-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to