On 2015-07-07, at 16:53, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
and sorry for my delay – I have a huge email backlog...
> We could do some cleaning of org-default-package-alist before Org 8.3.
Yes, yes, yes!
> * tolerance
>
> Why is "\\tolerance=1000" part of org-default-package-alist? Is this
> value good for all languages? If we keep it, it should be configurable.
> But people who explicitly wants this behavior can probably add it
> themselves.
>
> If it's a means to archive "high-quality" paragraphs, maybe microtype is
> probably the 'proper' fix...
My suggestion: forget about \tolerance. It’s low-level TeX stuff,
hardly anybody knows what it does, really (it is one of the dozen or two
parameters governing the line-breaking algorithm), and most people would
not see any difference anyway. I wouldn’t add microtype, OTOH. One
reason: it issues a lot of warnings when you use a font it does not
know. It doesn’t hurt, but some people don’t like warnings. Also, some
people might not really /want/ microtype – it messes around with font
widths, and even with the default settings (which are rather
conservative), it can look a bit strange.
> * Fixltx2e
>
> This packages is depreciated with TL2015 cf. LaTeX News 22. We can use
> \RequirePackage[current]{latexrelease} but there's no point in that....
> AFAIK latexrelease only useful for backwards compatibility.
Didn’t even know that.
> * marvosym¹
> * Wasysym²
My opinion: remove both.
> Rasmus
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
