On 2015-06-23 00:24, briangpowell . wrote:
> Cool, what do you do with "xmpp:"?
just opening 'psi-plus' here with a message window, I haven't figured
out how to do more (aka all this xmpp: url variants)
Again, just a crude works-for-me snippet:
;;; org-xmpp.el - Support for xmpp communication
(require 'org)
(org-add-link-type "xmpp" 'org-xmpp-open)
(defcustom org-xmpp-command "psi-plus --remote --uri='%u'"
"The Emacs command to be used to make a xmpp request."
:group 'org-link
:type '(string))
(defun org-xmpp-open (destination)
"make a xmpp to DESTINATION"
(start-process-shell-command "xmpp" nil
(org-replace-escapes org-xmpp-command
`(("%u" . ,destination)))))
(provide 'org-xmpp)
;;; org-xmpp.el ends here
Christian
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Christian Thaeter
> <ct.orgm...@pipapo.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 2015-06-22 11:27, Michael Strey wrote:
> >
> > > On So, 2015-06-21, Christian Thaeter wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > looks good, I'll use that instead of my hack.
> > >
> > > Look out for bugs. It's one of my very first emacs-lisp hacks.
> > >
> > > > I've a minor ideas to add:
> > > >
> > > > Instead just append the telephone number to the end of the
> > > > dial command one could use (org-replace-escapes STRING TABLE),
> > > > that allows little more flexible commandline generation.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the hint. Could you please give me an example where
> > > this increased flexibility would be required?
> >
> > I am using linphone too, where that just works to append the
> > sanitized telephone number at the end. But I can imagine that other
> > dial programs may have different calling conventions. Also I may
> > feel a bit safer by quoting the telephone number, For example:
> >
> > linephone -c 'sip:%n'
> >
> > Maybe in the long run (I have no urge here, works for me now).
> > You/we/someone could make this whole thing more generic, handling
> > different kinds of communication protocols (I made another one for
> > xmpp: meanwhile).
> >
> > tel: urls are somewhat simple https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3966.txt
> > (still surprisingly more syntax than just a number) but when you
> > look at sip: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-19.1 things
> > get way more complicated.
> >
> > Christian
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > --
> > > Michael Strey
> > > http://www.strey.biz * https://twitter.com/michaelstrey
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
