Titus von der Malsburg <malsb...@posteo.de> writes: > I can’t reproduce the second indent but I think it’s a bug that there is > any indentation at all. > > The documentation of `org-edit-special' (C-x ') says: > > Call a special editor for the element at point. … > > No mention of indentation or other reformatting of my code. > > The same goes for `org-edit-src-exit' (C-c C-c) which says: > > Kill current sub-editing buffer and return to source buffer. > > The edit-in-buffer feature should not touch the indentation. If the > syntax of the language is sensitive to indentation (e.g. Python) this > can break the code. Example: > > #+BEGIN_SRC python :results output > print "test" > #+END_SRC > > is invalid Python syntax. > > Also having one function perform two very different actions (edit code > in separate buffer *and* reformat the code) is poor design. At least in > this special case. When I open the code in a separate buffer but then > decide not to change it (C-c C-c), I'll end up with extra indentation > and this will create unnecessary changes when I commit the file in git.
Does the variable org-src-preserve-indentation get the behavior you're after? hth, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
