Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>> Then it cannot even replace inlinetasks. > > Is that a goal? It should be. We don't need another syntax for something that does almost the same thing as an inlinetask but, yet, isn't one. Inline todo/inlinetasks, there can only be one. > I think "totally useless" stretching it. Two examples. > > [@:1] My sentence on foo [@] and something else > > * Annotations > [@:1:Nicolas] Remember to refer to bar > > > #+TODO: Notes/Nicolas > My sentence on foo [Notes/Nicolas: Remember to refer to bar] and > something else. > > The latter is less precise, but I would still prefer it. I guess you > could add references to an endnote for long notes, which would bring it > closer to killing org-inlinetasks. I think you are missing my point. My goal is to be able to /mark/ a very specific part of the document (ranging from a word to a whole section). Your syntax cannot achieve that, because you need two markers, one at the beginning and one at the end of the area you need to mark. This is a dead-end. Also, I don't want to clutter the document with annotations, hence moving them to a specific section, while retaining a minimal syntax in the document. No matter how much you like it, your syntax isn't general enough for annotations. This is understandable, since you're after inline TODO, not annotations. Regards,
