Hi, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>> But note that I am more interested in an inline noting/todo functionality >> as opposed to annotation functionality. > > Inline noting is > > > Text[@:1][@] > > * Annotations > > [@:1:] My note. My guess would be that most notes are short. For such notes, but not necessarily for longer notes, [@:NOTE] would be more convenient. Though I don't know what the "@" signifies. I think whatever is the value of #+TODO makes more sense as prefixes. I don't think it would be easy to convince coauthors of documents, who are not using Emacs, that this is something "easy" to use. I guess not many people do XML in Nano or Notepad, since keeping track of opening and closing tags is a pain. Formatting tags, e.g. *, are somehow natural and shorter. Blocks are "easy" to see. > I don't know what is a TODO functionality since you suggest to not make > it appear in the agenda. E.g. "Sentence about BAR [TODO: add reference to FOO and check BAZ]". I don't need that in my agenda. >> Also, for annotation, would it not be annoying, in review session say, to >> have the notes so "far away" from the text? Perhaps not with the right >> helping tools. > > Again, not with proper tooling, e.g, remote editing like footnotes. But this is a change to the *format*, not its principal editor. —Rasmus -- Er du tosset for noge' lårt!
