Hi Rainer, 2015ko martxoak 9an, Rainer M Krug-ek idatzi zuen: > > Hi > > Consider the following: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > * The calculation > #+NAME: testcode :exports both
It looks like you’ve tried to put a header argument into the name. Is it merely an accident? I ask because... > #+begin_src R :session test > runif(10) > #+end_src > > > * summary of the results > First time > #+RESULTS: testcode :exports both > | 0.772744940361008 | > | 0.170518629485741 | > | 0.0833237133920193 | > | 0.149035625392571 | > | 0.698798568220809 | > | 0.627075897762552 | > | 0.177144371205941 | > | 0.0476319056469947 | > | 0.289851602632552 | > | 0.0296813279855996 | > > * and another > testthingy > #+RESULTS: testcode :exports both ...here it reoccurs, in identical format. This is fine, interpreted as just a weird block name (and not as an actual header argument). But if you’re trying to allow the header arguments to vary for the two result blocks I don’t think it will be very nice. (It would require re-evaluating the code block for each different combination of header arguments, which would give unexpected behavior in the case of side effects, etc. etc.) Maybe it’s not very important, but I just figured I’d ask for clarification. Thanks, -- Aaron Ecay
