Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: >> Perhaps the difference is too subtle. Note that you would never deal with >> a `citation' other than through a mapping. > > Hmm. I still find `citations/citation' pair confusing. What about > `citation/part'?
So (citation ⋯ :parts ((part ⋯) (part ⋯))). Fine with me. Other possibilities are citation/entry and :entries. Or less nice: citation/cite and :cites. >> Right, I was trying *to add* support for [@k1; ⋯;@kN]. > > Please don't. Let's keep shortcuts simple. It would enable "complicated argument [@k1;@k2;@k3]", which is pretty nice. There's still no pre and post notes etc, only keys. —Rasmus -- Together we'll stand, divided we'll fall
