Richard Lawrence <richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu> writes: > You're right that consistency in that syntax would be a good thing. > Moreover, Org already has syntax that looks a lot like plists in > #+ATTR_BACKEND lines and in Babel source block headers, so it seems > natural to adopt something like it for other sorts of objects.
Org also already has [fn:·:·] that already is supported inline and looks an awful lot like [cite:·:·]. . . —Rasmus -- Hooray!
