Richard Lawrence <richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu> writes:
> Basically, I think you could ignore the distinctions that the [cite:
> ...] syntax is capable of expressing, and just write all your citations
> like:
>
> [cite: See @Doe99 for more on this point.] %%(:type footnoted)
>
> or, in the syntax Nicolas proposed, something like:
>
> [cite: See @Doe99 for more on this point.]{:type footnoted}
>
> You would then use an export filter to transform citations with this
> :type into the appropriate command, something along the lines of:
This seems backward and wrong /to me/. Why not global options? I
actually think we "agreed" on this earlier.
#+cite: text-cite
#+(cite): parenthesis-cite
Or
#+cite: numeric
#+(cite): footnote-cite
This is why I asked Tom earlier if he normally uses more than two citation
TYPES. Presumably citeauthor and citeyear works irrespective of the main
citation type. So I still think that having two TYPES handy will meet
most requirements.
—Rasmus
--
m-mm-mmm-mmmm bacon!
